Home » Users » Kate Drazner » Blog » Reading Between the Smears...

You must be logged in to complete this action

Democracy for America personal blog for Kate Drazner

Reading Between the Smears, or the Sad, Slow, National Progress Toward Justice

Written by: Kate Drazner on Sep 14, 2008 8:50 PM EDT

Comic 3

Nine weeks until the election, and still, the Obama camp is experiencing the "M" tag as the hardest to shake. It's the most simply misunderstood fact about Barack Obama, the easiest to debunk, and yet many anti-Obamans cling to it like their lives were dependent on it.

This is partly due to the fact that saying Barack Obama is a Muslim is just a euphemism for thinking something even worse.

Reports Christopher Dickey of Newsweek:

Yet even a third cousin of mine in the mountains of North Carolina, an independent-minded Democrat who voted for Gore in 2000 and Bush in 2004, said he can't bring himself to vote for Obama, either. Why? "Because I believe he is a Muslim," said my cousin. Not so, I said. He was raised a Christian and is a practicing Christian. My cousin shook his head. "I just don't believe him," he said...Dent Myers, a relic collector and self-caricaturing bigot in Kennesaw, Ga., north of Atlanta...argues that when Southerners criticize Obama, "They say, 'He's a Muslim, he's a mulatto Muslim, or quadroon Muslim ... [only because] they don't want to use the old N word."

Sure, we can look at the Muslim smear (which, I argue, shouldn't even be a smear in and of itself), we could attribute it to the aptitude of the American people to 'buy' their information at face value just like they're buying clothes, cars and fitness regimes (such is the ever-expanding empire of market-based capitalism); this would also explain why the McCain smear ads, as outrageous as we find them, seem to be working. But, perhaps, the Muslim excuse is just a band-aid for the shamefulness of the fact that many Americans simply don't want to put an African-American man in the White House.

Explains Marty Kaplan:

This argument -- called "the Bradley effect," after the Election Day disappearance of the lead that Los Angeles' African-American mayor, Tom Bradley, had held until then in the gubernatorial campaign -- says that the percentages that black candidates get in polls should be discounted by the reluctance of no small number of white voters to admit that race is a factor in their choice.

As far as we would like to believe we've progressed as a nation, it saddens me to no end to see retroactive attitudes in the subtexts of anti-Obama rhetoric (which, I may add, is completely embodied if not emboldened by the McCain campaign). The "do-we-really-know-Barack-Obama?" messages, the "Barack-Obama-disrespected-poor-white-woman-Sarah-Palin" messages, the "Was-Obama-really-born-in-this-country" myths, these messages send subtextual signals that:

1.) Barack Obama cannot be trusted, and is to be feared
2.) Barack Obama is irreverent, and should be put in his place
3.) Barack Obama is un-American
How sad that these messages hearken back to the pre-civil rights era, and how sad that America has lost its sensitivities to such repugnant attitudes.

The simple truth is, there is ample evidence that McCain is a war-loving, volatile-tempered, anti-feminist, hot-headed conservative who may desire to see the U.S. in a never-ending state of war, while our economy (something he has professed not to know much about) crumbles here at home. Barack Obama has proven to be an even-tempered, throughtful, analytical and humble public servant. And yet the McCain campaign has fear-mongered it's way back to the 50s and told its base to fear him. And these latent retro attitudes may be the hardest thing we have to fight against.

So what can we do? I didn't mean for this post to come off as defeatist, because I believe now that we know the nature of the beast, we can fight back. We should be talking to our comrades across the ideological divide; ask them why they believe what they believe about Barack Obama, tell them the facts, don't let them off the hook, and, as uncomfortable as it may be, expose the latent attitudes beneath their anti-Obama rationale. It's possible that the majority of those conversations may not end in a revelation of sorts, but we can at least hope that between now and election time, part of America may start to reexamine their fears about the Democratic nominee.

Tags:

Discuss
 

Reply

35t276143

- I'd like to know

By Kate Drazner on Sep 14, 2008 8:53 PM EDT

...what are the ways that people out there find to be most successful when talking to conservatives?

N734823365_4437_tinythumb

- What kind of conservative? And what do you mean by success? Conservative is kind of a dishonorable descriptive word to use these days.

By Susan Rowe on Sep 15, 2008 11:03 AM EDT

Are you asking about ones who already have McCain's bumper stick on their SUVs or ones who think the Clintons are immoral and disgraced the office of the presidency? Personally I wouldn't waste anytime talking to either type.  They're not going to vote for Obama or any Democrat. But if you're in a situation where you have to talk to them tell them when they are lying and then tell them the truth. Act like their parent and always scold them when they're lying.  If they start calling you names, spit at you or threaten you tell them to get out of your face and tell them that they're not welcome in your space. And then do call the police. If they send their little children over to harass you tell them that they should seek some better roles models and then send them home. If their parents are around tell them that they're bad parents for using little children to do their hateful mean-spirited dirty work.  Call that kind of behavior what it is, evil. 

35t276143

- Well, there are many types of conservatives

By Kate Drazner on Sep 15, 2008 4:08 PM EDT

some more evil than others. I tend to find social conservatives some of the creepiest individuals who walk the planet, but sometimes we can see eye to eye with them on humanitarian issues. Fiscal conservatives sometimes are more liberal when it comes to social policy...I find myself talking to these folks sometimes and then pointing out the hypocrisies in their ideology- if you believe "government hands off" for your money, but to get there youre willing to vote for a guy who is running on the most socially conservative ticket weve ever seen, a ticket that actually enforces the government's power to tell us what the morally right thing is to do with our bodies, religions and minds, well...that's a hypocrisey. I pointed this out to a fiscal conservative the other day and he was actually pretty receptive to what I had to say.

N734823365_4437_tinythumb

- Invite that person to lunch on your treat.

By Susan Rowe on Sep 15, 2008 7:14 PM EDT

Then see if they offer to leave a generous tip or end up complaining about the service. If they do leave a tip, then perhaps there is some hope for them.

In truth there really has not been any fiscal responsible conservative Republicans or Democrats in congress for a very long time.  They've all been voting for Bush's disastrous ecomonic policies. The political term 'fiscal conservative' really is an oxymoron these days.

Default_user

- Get inside their OODA loops

By dog soldier on Sep 15, 2008 11:16 AM EDT

Over and Defense and the National Interest, there was a short discussion how McCain got inside Obama's OODA loop.  The OODA loop means Observe, Orientate, Decide and Act.  The idea of getting inside the loop is to do something that forces a response and do sometihng again and again before an effective sounter-strategy s deployed.  This is basic 4GW.

What Palin has done is give McCain the narrative edge.  McCain knows he loses on issues.  Obama has to get McCain's loop by constantly hitting and destroying McCain's position.

Start with..Health Care..McCain is dead from cancer if it wasn't for his government health care.  Why is McCain so willing to let 20K folks die per year.

Before McCain can respond..change the subject.  Obama treats the campaign like a debate class.  McCain says something and Obama responds to that single item without broadening his attack.  McCain treats the political campaign like a military war

 

 

 

Default_user

- Turn their argument back at them

By dog soldier on Sep 15, 2008 11:23 AM EDT

I do this a lot with health care..(my most important issue).
If they say heath care for all is so expensive then tell them we are already paying for it in lost wages and early deaths.
When tols that the US will never stand for socal. medicie tell them it is not soc. med. It is single payer medicine and not the difference. Cite poll after poll that says folks want it. My neighbor who is against it is watching his childen and grand kids gointo horrible debt without health care. I tell him he is support of McCain is destroying his kid's future.

I am not very nice when talking to folks. No more saying gee, I understand...nope...it generally ends up .."you are a friggin' idiot. Ship a big box to your daughter because that will be her new home."

Add your comment

(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)

Post closed to commenting

Videos of some of the 64 House Healthcare Heroes standing strong for a public health insurance option

Congressman Emanuel Cleaver



Congressman Lloyd Dogget



Congressman Keith Ellison



Congressman Bob Filner



Congressman Phil Hare



Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey



Congresswoman Maxine Waters

Blog for America

Recent Blog Posts

The Watercooler