Home » Users » Eric Weis » Blog » The Palinization of Polar...
Democracy for America personal blog for Eric Weis
The Palinization of Polar Bears and America
Linked to groups: The Passaic County Green Party, NJ for Democracy, Passaic County DFA, DFA County Committee Project, BlueWaveNJ, Pequannock DFA
Linked to campaigns: Obama for America
I guess I have to start blogging sometime. Sarah Palin will address the nation soon. It is 9:30PM EDT Sept 3rd on the eve of her appearance before the Republican DysConvention in Saint Paul. Perhaps this little blog will have some effect at deflating the impending dirigible coming our way.
Why is America abuzz over Sarah? How does a woman with her qualifications rise to be one of 50 state Governors of the United States? The answer is simple. The media is the message, said Marshall McLuhan, and he was right.
Sarah Palin is the epitome of the talking head. Trained in communication-journalism, she is ambitious and she is attractive. These qualities are now engrained in the American culture; the handsome and pretty make it big in the networks, but Walter Cronkhite or Edward R. Murrow would not stand a chance these days.
Sarah undoubtedly knows how to handle a teleprompter, and deal with the cameras and lights. As such, she advances even though the quality of her vision, of her thinking, and of her experience do not amount to a hill of tundra (known in Arctic parlance as a hummock). Scratch the permafrost that is Sarah Palin's exterior, and you will find a muddy mess below.
Just take one example, of a topic that she should have down "cold". The Polar Bear. Sarah has found it possible to reject the recommendations of the Bush administration (based on good science and years of pressure) to place the Polar Bear on the endangered species list. Amazingly, she thinks otherwise. Studies in the Beaufort Sea (only a small part of the Arctic) show an increase in PB populations. So, to appease the hunting lobby (of which she is a card-carrying, gun-toting member), Sarah goes to an extreme which lies beyond even our sitting President.
Is this thinking? Does this show an understanding of the transnational nature of the Arctic and global warming? Whether one agrees that warming is caused by humans or not, the evidence of PB population declines is incontrovertible. But Sarah is able to ignore this, and do the grandstanding act which elevates her reputation in the eyes of the Alaskan hunters (and there are many). But don't accept her reasoning on subsistence hunting. Nobody, not the Inuit or other native Americans, has ever subsisted on the PB. They do and did indeed hunt Nanuk, as a cultural test of maturation. And indigenous cultures can and should be maintained. But hunting clearly drove the PB population down in the 1960s and 1970s. For more detail, go to the following internet site:
http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/bear-facts/polar-bears-and-conservation/
Hunting should be banned. Exceptions can be made by treaty with the Inuit (in Nunavik, parts of which were formerly known as the Northwest Terroritories and the Yukon Territory, the Canadian government is able to toe the line on the endangered species issue). Sarah Palin, leading Alaska, seems able if not willing to ignore the rest of the world and science to boot.
So why this rant on Sarah Palin and the Polar Bear? Because it shows her lack of understanding of a relatively easy issue, one that she ought to have down cold. Now test Sarah Palin on international trade, on diplomatic relations with the emerging Third World, on the balance of trade, on nuclear nonproliferation, on healthcare and entitlements or on her potential position as PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE (yes, that is one of the roles played by a US Vice President) and I will summarize by saying...
FOLKS, WE'LL HAVE TROUBLE IN RIVER CITY.
America needs to invest in education, in cultural reformation and in reconciliation so that the talking heads no longer are our heroes. America's heroes need to be engineers, teachers, doctors, scientists, nurses, assembly line workers and yes, even our politicians in public service. When we elect a talking head, we do so at our peril.
- "Arctic Eric"
NOAA/JAWS Arctic Program 1971
Bowdoin College "Polar Bear" 1973
But she is a proponent of petroleum development, in tune with McCain, although the two disagree on drilling in Alaska's protected Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. She favours drilling there, while he opposes it.
The governor also opposed designating polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, fearing that step would get in the way of a proposed natural gas pipeline tapping the North Slope's vast reserves.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/usvotes/story/2008/08/29/mccain-vp.html
it was both, and the excuses given had to do with protecting the rights of subsistence hunters. same arguments used with the wolves issue (aerial hunting) tho main argument there was to protect caribou herd. i have lived in places where caribou roam. wolves are a predator but natural processes predominate, herds decline as forage is overgrazed, then predators decline as prey decreases. as for drilling, you can operate in the presence of bears. ask the residents of churchill canada. you just take precautions when you go out near areas where bears are looking for food. they are pretty damn easy to spot from a distance. they are HUGE. a PB is 2 - 3x the size of large brown or black bear. standing up, they can reach 10 feet easy. PROTECT THE POLAR BEAR!!!!!
Eric Weis
Bowdoin College '73
Home of Peary-MacMillan Arctic Museum
it was both, and the excuses given had to do with protecting the rights of subsistence hunters. same arguments used with the wolves issue (aerial hunting) tho main argument there was to protect caribou herd. i have lived in places where caribou roam. wolves are a predator but natural processes predominate, herds decline as forage is overgrazed, then predators decline as prey decreases. as for drilling, you can operate in the presence of bears. ask the residents of churchill canada. you just take precautions when you go out near areas where bears are looking for food. they are pretty damn easy to spot from a distance. they are HUGE. a PB is 2 - 3x the size of large brown or black bear. standing up, they can reach 10 feet easy. PROTECT THE POLAR BEAR!!!!!
Eric Weis
Bowdoin College '73
Home of Peary-MacMillan Arctic Museum
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)Post closed to commenting
| My DFA | |
| Members | |
| Groups | |
| Events | |
| Candidates | |
![]() |
|
Blog for America
-
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST -
Death at Wal-Mart--True Meaning of the Holidays
By Thomas Janowski on Nov 29, 2008 8:00 AM EST -
My better nature coming through
By Jack Bucci on Nov 26, 2008 10:21 AM EST -
Action Alerts
By Kenneth Quinnell on Nov 23, 2008 2:20 PM EST -
The Cheney Legacy:
By Jeff Morris-Saugerties, N.Y.- De on Nov 22, 2008 1:40 AM EST
Recent Blog Posts
-
Cutting Edge Scientific Industries Co. Ltd
By schoolsupplies on Dec 3, 2008 1:54 AM EST -
A NEW CONVERTED DEMOCRAT WHO SUPPORTS OBAMA!!
By STEVEN B on Dec 2, 2008 7:27 PM EST -
Tuesday articles
By Gerry L on Dec 2, 2008 8:06 AM EST -
On Traffic Checkpoints, Part One, Or, Freedom? That's So...Inefficient
By fake consultant on Dec 1, 2008 9:44 PM EST -
Still Waiting
By Dave Santucci on Dec 1, 2008 4:49 PM EST






- Personally,
By puddle on Sep 4, 2008 4:45 PM EDTI think it didn't have to do with hunters, rather with drilling. . . .
Just me.