Home » Blog » Howard Dean & The Moral Center

Blog for America

Howard Dean & The Moral Center

Written by: Guest Writer on Feb 12, 2005 3:39 AM EST

By Reverend Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.

Now that Governor Dean has successfully out-campaigned his opponents for the DNC Chair, the cries of those who never supported him fill the air: "He must move to the center."

At the National Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, we agree—it is long past time for the Democratic Party to get back to the moral center. During slavery, conservatives wanted to maintain slavery. Liberals wanted a kinder, friendlier face on slavery. But the moral center sought the abolition of slavery. Conservatives did not fight legal segregation. They did not march in Selma for the right to vote.

The moral center always comes from outside the system, from the bottom, up, or from some leader with a vision willing to challenge the status quo.

The political center often chooses short term expediency over long term principles. Vanity asked, is it popular; politics asked, will it work; morality and conscience asks, is it right. To get our nation back on the course of its promise, we must answer the "is it right" question—that the moral center, one much more profound than the political center.

In August, 1996, I gave a speech entitled "The Moral Center" to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. I pointed out that as we gathered in the United Center that night, the following facts ring as true today as ever:

— 1/5 of all American children will go to bed in poverty;
— 1/2 of all African American children, growing up amidst broken sidewalks, broken families, broken cities, broken dreams;
— the #1 growth industry in urban America—jails;
— 1/2 of all the public housing built in this nation during the last decade—jails;
— the top 1% wealthiest Americans own as much as the bottom 95%—the greatest inequality since the 1920s.
During Bill Clinton's second term, our booming economy eased some of these pains. Employment went up, poverty went down, the growing gap between rich and poor slightly narrowed. Then came an election in Florida, where the fundamental flaws in our voting system were exposed—the loser won, and the winner lost, and voter irregularities—and collusion between partisan Florida elected officials and the Supreme Court—fundamentally crippled democracy.

Under the Bush administration, all domestic public policy has been tilted towards the already rich and powerful. The canyon between rich and poor has gotten larger and larger. Poverty has again increased. More Americans are without health insurance. Wages are stagnant, jobs are stagnant, pensions are declining—and now Social Security is on the chopping block. Repeated tax cuts for the upper class of our society have vastly increased the deficit, while the Bush Administration has left its "compassion" on the campaign trail.

This administration is one of the most ideologically driven administrations in history—they believe there should be no roof of opportunities for the rich and powerful, no safety net or floor for the poor.

This week's smoke and mirrors budget—one that does not even account for the massive war spending Iraq and the new $80 billion appropriation request—makes the hypocrisy, the disparities, very clear. All the gains go to those who already have a lot; all the pain goes to those who are already hurting.

And, of course, the war in Iraq continues. Bush's pretext for rushing to war—WMD's, imminent threat—have now been exposed as false. None of it was true. Several commandments were broken. President and Vice-President would like us to focus on the Iraqis who came out to vote, and they are deserving of praise. But some of us can also focus on the outcome of that vote—did we really invade Iraq in order to vote Iran's religious allies into power?

The aggressive, pre-emptive invasion of Iraq besmirched the reputation of the United States, violated our own rules and laws, and transgressed the moral center. Some of us still remember.

Where's the moral center in the Bush/Cheney Iraq policy?

So we do call on our new DNC Chairman to move our party to the center—the moral center. We call on Howard Dean to do what he does best—to tell the truth, to stand up and fight for the defenseless and the weak, to point out the corrupt and biased priorities by which this Administration, this Congress, and this GOP are pushing.

Howard Dean knows how to deliver health care to children—that's fighting for the moral center.

Howard Dean knows how to involve more Americans in their party and their democracy—that's the best of our nation's history, its moral center.

Howard Dean had enough gumption to stand up and oppose the war in Iraq—and that opposition was, and still is, the moral center.

Howard Dean understands that we cannot continue to boost the already wealthy, cut the thin budgets of the poor, and outsource the jobs that sustain the middle class—that's not the moral center.

Howard Dean knows that using false terminology like "personal accounts" to try to hide the destruction of FDR's greatest legacy, our sacred trust with the Greatest Generation, Social Security, is just plain wrong. Dr. Dean's view is the moral center. Does anyone truly believe that Jesus would be scheming to move our Social Security program from the elderly on Main Street to investment firms on Wall Street?

Howard Dean knows that it's time for reform inside the Democratic Party; it's time to air out the ethical stench of the DeLay Congress; it's time to open up the secret books and closed-door schemes of the Bush Administration—it's time to open up our political system to real people and small donors again, and clear out the special interests, the big-fee lobbyists, the corporate corrupters from the halls of government once again. That fight is in the moral center.

Howard Dean knows that the air waves belong to the public. That fight's the moral center.

Howard Dean knows that until the right to vote is guaranteed, and the right to organize is respected, our democracy and our economy will be in jeopardy. So we encourage him to keep fighting to move the Democratic Party to the moral center.

America at its best is not the private playground of the mean-spirited, the war-mongers, the greedy, the hypocrites; America at its best is the nation that enlarges its democracy, shares its wealth, fights only to defend itself, tries to make life easier for those Jesus called "the least of these."

That's the moral center. That's where the Democratic Party belongs.

Tags:

Discuss
 

Reply

Default_user

-

By Ms. M on Feb 12, 2005 3:52 AM EST

Dean is truly 1st!

Default_user

-

By A MacDean on Feb 12, 2005 4:02 AM EST
Thank you, Reverend Jackson. I think many of us agree with you. Governor ... no, Chairman ... Dean has revealed America's moral center. Not always the easy, nor popular among those in power.

All best wishes are sent with you, Governor, as you embark upon this new challenge and opportunity.

We are with you!
Default_user

-

By Ray on Feb 12, 2005 4:15 AM EST

Thank you Jesse Jackson; the Democratic party has called on you to speak every four years in the past; Howard will call on you to speak all the time, not just one season every four years but all seasons. Thank you for always standing up for those without a voice.

Default_user

-

By Oscar on Feb 12, 2005 4:24 AM EST

Dean is first, but Jesse can sure tell it! If you didn't read the whole post then read it - it's mm-mm good.

Default_user

-

By Oscar on Feb 12, 2005 4:24 AM EST

And thanks Ray - I got stranded for hours last night on a dead thread.

Default_user

-

By JudyforDean on Feb 12, 2005 4:26 AM EST
Yeessss!

~~~~~~~
"The moral center always comes from outside the system, from the bottom, up, or from some leader with a vision willing to challenge the status quo."

~~~~~~~

Yes, Jesse, always with a flair for great words and a quick recognition of the "leader with a vision willing to challenge the status quo."

Thank you for this and the other great posts, HQ!

We're all Howard-Powered!
Default_user

-

By JudyforDean on Feb 12, 2005 4:28 AM EST
... I got stranded for hours last night on a dead thread.
Posted by Oscar at February 12, 2005 04:24 AM

~~~~~~
Don't worry, Oscar. When those of us who were later arrivals realized what had happened, we just went back to read. Puddle also reposted your message for others in later threads.

So your posting was not in vain, even if in solitary splendor.
Default_user

-

By JudyforDean on Feb 12, 2005 4:29 AM EST
Must rise to run errands. This is MUCH more fun!

Happy blogging! It's a great day for Dean Believers!
Default_user

-

By JudyforDean on Feb 12, 2005 4:32 AM EST
my head sping = my head spin

Just saw this now. But now that I think about it, "sping" may actually be a good expression!

This time I'm really gone!
Default_user

-

By Ray on Feb 12, 2005 4:32 AM EST
Sure Oscar, hope you are doing well.

And JudyforDean great posts.
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 4:57 AM EST
Good morning,

Well, the vote hasn't been taken yet, so I can still harrangue.

It's nice to see Jesse Jackson, Sr. here. When he ran for President I sent him money and voted for him, too.

But, in reading over his post, I'm inclined to think that, while it is all true and I agree, the part about who's got what part of the money pie probably detracts because there's a whole lot of people who just don't care how much money somone else has.
And, actually, the negligence and deprivation we decry has nothing to do with money. Just as the current Administration's mantra about handing people control over their retirement money is hollow. You can't eat money and you can't put it on like a magic patch to make you well. The people who have the knowledge, skill and expertise to provide the things other people need, need to be willing to provide them. Giving them ever more money is obviously not a good motivator.
People aren't deprived of good medical care because they have no money; they're deprived because the community hospitals and clinics that were set up decades ago to deliver those services have been turned over to people who prefer to allocate those services selectively.
If we were really being egalitarian, we would encourage people to chose the medical care providers that are most convenient and most suited to their needs and then just make sure the providers get paid. We wouldn't put so much time and effort into the allocation process.
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 5:18 AM EST
Posted by JudyforDean at February 12, 2005 04:22 AM

Yes, what the people who think destruction is good because it gives rise to something new have no understanding for is that the pain they inflict on the people who are injured in the process will not heal. While the people who perished in Dresden had a few hours or moments of terror, it's the survivors who have suffered for sixty years, but not as much as the residents of our inner cities which were similarly destroyed but over a much longer period of time and for no reason. The Germans at least knew that their leaders had started the war and brought down punishment on all of them. The people Jesse Jackson has been struggling for were entirely innocent. The cities were destroyed around them because the people who claimed to "own" the land and buildings didn't care about the people who lived in them.
When people hate you with good reason, its easier to cope than when you are just an innocent victim and nobody does anything to protect you.
That's why what is being done to Iraq is so awful. Saddam Hussein did nothing to the Americans, except run his mouth.
And if you listen to the SoS, you'll hear the same irritation that Iran and North Korea's leaders are saying things America doesn't want to hear. That this attitude is not consistent with our supposed commitment to freedom of speech doesn't register with the people who consider themselves in charge of other people's moral and social responsibilities.
From their perspective, the only good thing about free speech is that it lets them know when people are thinking bad thoughts.
Default_user

-

By GoingNova_in_WA on Feb 12, 2005 6:00 AM EST
With all respect to Professor Lakoff, I don't think Lakoff has anything on Jackson when it comes to framing. That was very well written. Reverend Jackson never ceases to amaze me. I don't know if anyone cought his speech from The National Press Club the other week, but it was fantastic. Probably one of the best speeches I've heard yet.

Anyway, it's going to be a great day today. May you all have an excellent morning.
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 6:03 AM EST
Here are the cosponsors of the class action fairness act:

Sen Alexander, Lamar [TN] - 1/25/2005 Sen Allen, George [VA] - 2/9/2005
Sen Bond, Christopher S. [MO] - 2/7/2005 Sen Carper, Thomas R. [DE] - 1/25/2005
Sen Chafee, Lincoln [RI] - 1/25/2005 Sen Collins, Susan M. [ME] - 2/3/2005
Sen Cornyn, John [TX] - 2/10/2005 Sen DeMint, Jim [SC] - 1/25/2005
Sen DeWine, Mike [OH] - 1/31/2005 Sen Dodd, Christopher J. [CT] - 1/25/2005
Sen Ensign, John [NV] - 1/25/2005 Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA] - 1/25/2005
Sen Frist, William H. [TN] - 1/25/2005 Sen Hagel, Chuck [NE] - 1/25/2005
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] - 1/25/2005 Sen Kohl, Herb [WI] - 1/25/2005
Sen Kyl, Jon [AZ] - 1/25/2005 Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA] - 1/25/2005
Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. [CT] - 1/25/2005 Sen Lincoln, Blanche L. [AR] - 1/25/2005
Sen Lott, Trent [MS] - 1/25/2005 Sen Lugar, Richard G. [IN] - 1/25/2005
Sen Martinez, Mel [FL] - 1/25/2005 Sen McCain, John [AZ] - 2/7/2005
Sen McConnell, Mitch [KY] - 1/25/2005 Sen Santorum, Rick [PA] - 1/26/2005
Sen Schumer, Charles E. [NY] - 1/25/2005 Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] - 1/25/2005
Sen Snowe, Olympia J. [ME] - 1/25/2005 Sen Sununu, John E. [NH] - 1/31/2005
Sen Thune, John [SD] - 1/25/2005 Sen Vitter, David [LA] - 1/25/2005
Sen Voinovich, George V. [OH] - 1/25/2005
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 6:06 AM EST
And here's the letter I left for Senator Sununu on his site.


It would be nice to think that when our representatives support legislation they not only know what they are doing but have all the citizens' best interests in mind.
Neither seems to be the case in Senator Sununu's support for revisions in the process of civil litigation. The oft expressed notion that law-suits on behalf of large numbers of injured people are frivolous is just plain wrong. Also, the assertion that these suits are somehow worthless because the lawyers who file them get more money out of any decision in the injured parties' favor than do the injured themselves has no validity.
When someone has been injured on purpose and the state prosecutes a criminal complaint, almost all of the cost of the process is paid for by the state, as is the cost of imposing punishment on the guilty. The injured person gets no compensation, except the satisfaction that the community has recognized the wrong and taken action.
So, it is being argued, why should the result of a successful prosecution for intentional negligence be any different? While the finding of guilt actually results in some monetary compensation from the guilty party to cover the cost of the prosecution, a token payment to the injured, who can never be made whole anyway, is somehow being discounted as not worth the effort under the mantle of "reform."
Indeed, the argument seems to be that since the amount of the award is not significant to the injured parties it should just be dispensed with. Never mind the importance of making sure that the people who do the work of proving negligent behavior get paid and that the people who are proved to have been negligent are deterred from doing it again. Neither of which will be accomplished by a slap on the wrist.
The argument on which the "reforms" supported by the Senator seem to be based is that because people convicted of crimes get away without paying for the process, people found guilty of negligence should do so as well. That's not a position most law-abiding and responsible citizens are likely to support when they come to understand what's going on.
At a minimum it will be an interesting topic for discussion during the next election cycle.
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 6:11 AM EST
BTW, just noticed on Sununu's site that Chertoff's nomination as Homeland Security Chief is up for consideration by the Senate on Monday, starting at noon.
Since this is the guy who managed to quash the Lindt case so the fact that he was tortured by Americans when he was captured in Afghanistan was never brought out into the open so it could be stopped back then, this should be an interesting discussion.
Default_user

-

By dkmich on Feb 12, 2005 6:16 AM EST
THIS IS A MUST READ. MORE EVIDENCE OF WHY DEAN SHOULD BE PRES.

Letter from a Vermonter
Jack Bryar, a resident of Vermont, has this to say about Howard Dean...

http://thwip.polyamory.org/thwip/Dean/bryar.html


"...As a resident of VT, I have spoken out against Dean on lots of occasions. It's the guy's style. What you see is what you get, and if he thinks you're being impractical he'll tell you so, and if there's a reporter around he'll still tell you so. Why on earth would I (and most Vermonters) think a guy like that would make a good president? Because I've seen Howard when the chips were down."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Default_user

-

By Phil*from*Iowa. on Feb 12, 2005 6:26 AM EST
WOOt!

went for dinner last night and by the time I got back "old creaky" couldn't handle it...the good news ...no hangover

I am still pumped about today.

bushco handed us an off year issue in Social Security that Howard should be able to use recruiting the best Congressional candidates all across America

There isn't a SINGLE Republican in a safe seat thanks to Rove and the d*cks big mistake

The health and productivity of the American workforce secures the solvency of the Social Security and every other institution that makes America a great nation.

If you can't build a winning campaign on that positive vision you may not have cut it in DC anyway.

Dean people are the positive ones right now in the party and we can help Howard with his recruitment in all fifty states.
Default_user

-

By Mel_2.12istheNew11.3 on Feb 12, 2005 6:34 AM EST
Good- no, make that SPECTACULAR- morning!

Today feels like Christmas. You know, except without that feeling of impending inaugural doom and the urge to vomit every time I saw a church and was reminded of how a holiday devoted to peace and rebirth had been usurped by murderous, bigot pigs like Shrub & Santorum.

Today, I will drink the champagne I bought for November 3rd's victory toast. I figured in November I'd save it for the Pats superbowl hat-trick, but by the time the Super Bowl came around, Dean was already the Last (read: ONLY) Man Standing!

CONGRATULATIONS to the DNC's new Chair, to us, and to all Americans and people of the world who will benefit from his leadership.

The fight begins today...

*cheers*
Default_user

-

By Phil*from*Iowa. on Feb 12, 2005 6:40 AM EST
The job of Chair is most like the general manager of an NFL team where a main job is assembling the team of top coaches who are given top players.

The makeup of the rookie class that hands control back to the dems will be an awesome group of Dean folks.

We are the scouts, and it is a key job.

We are less than two years away from ending the slide, and we would have been with Dean in the White House if DeLay was still a leader in the House.

We need DFA to keep on top of Howard's schedule because he will be coming to a state near you.
.
Default_user

-

By ELR on Feb 12, 2005 6:47 AM EST
What a wonderful post, Rev. Jackson. Is it alright if I reserve the right to steal that last paragraph?

Today in WNC reminds me of the scene in Mary Poppins where all the nanny's are standing in line and all of a sudden a burst of wind comes to blow them all away. The wind is blowing fiercely outside as if to usher in the new Democratic spirit and chase away the old. The weather seems prophetic. Change is in the air.

I wish everyone a glorious day and Gov. Dean a glorious future.
Default_user

-

By Phil*from*Iowa. on Feb 12, 2005 6:50 AM EST
I'm the CEO of my little Corp. and every year after I re-register, the National Chamber of Commerce gives me a recruitment call to join them.

That class action bill was something they were claiming to be working on 8-10 years ago. They always mention it as why to join them.Really it has been a long time coming for them.

I think the plan was to stampede GREAT HEIST II (SS) through early but that has failed so they are going with a series of bills that will peal off a handlful for this or that legislation that doesn't seem earthshaking on the surface.

I don't think you can defeat them nationally on which jurisdiction a class action suit is in even if it means justice will be denied millions.


Recruit candidates that care about the welfare of the people and the good votes follow.
Default_user

-

By franster on Feb 12, 2005 6:51 AM EST

Thank you, Reverend Jackson. Stirring, beautiful words with which to start a new chapter in the life of the Democrats and in the life of democracy. My only regret is that I could not hear the words delivered in your rich baritone voice.

Default_user

-

By Chi on Feb 12, 2005 6:58 AM EST

Thank you, Reverend Jackson.



The moral center. Exactly. Thank you for your eloquence at getting to the heart of the matter.

Default_user

-

By GoingNova_in_WA on Feb 12, 2005 7:15 AM EST
This is for Sitka: (because of complaints of complacency from the blog)

This is the list of traitorous Democrats that voted for the "Class Action Fairness Act of 2005".

These are the Democrats that chose the interests of greedy business entities, over the interests of We The People.

These are the Democrats that chose to STAB THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THE BACK.

Bayh (D-IN)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Schumer (D-NY)

If one of these traitors are from your state, please write to them and let them know that the interests of We The People should be the only interests they are to consider.

Thanks. And again, excellent morning to you all.

~Brian from Carbonado, WA
Default_user

-

By Phil*from*Iowa. on Feb 12, 2005 7:24 AM EST
All my shouting today is going to be celebratory.

yyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!

wOOt! wOOt!

later
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:27 AM EST
I am humbled to be the presence of Reverend Jackson; absolutely humbled.

If things turn out exactly as he articulates in his guest blog - we are in for good times ahead.

Why? Because there is a certain "kindness" toward others in that post. A brotherhood of people! This is exactly what the Democratic Party was in the past. If Howard can bring the focus back to this - well, can I just say: I love you Howard!
Default_user

-

By Mike*in*Raleigh*NC on Feb 12, 2005 7:29 AM EST
I guess they wont be filming the next episode of ER at this place.............

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - A car bomb exploded in front of a hospital in a mostly Shiite town south of Baghdad Saturday, killing 17 and wounding 21, police and hospital officials said, a day after 23 were killed in two attacks aimed at the Shiite community.

A police captain who refused to give his name said the Saturday blast occurred in front of the main hospital in Musayyib, 35 miles south of the capital in a religiously mixed area that's been the scene of frequent attacks by Sunni Muslim insurgents.

Elsewhere, a prominent Iraqi judge under Saddam Hussein, Taha al-Amiri, was assassinated Saturday by two gunmen in the southern port city of Basra, said Lt. Col. Karim al-Zaidi.
Default_user

-

By Mike*in*Raleigh*NC on Feb 12, 2005 7:30 AM EST

Jolly Good Luck today, Governor Dean.

Default_user

-

By franster on Feb 12, 2005 7:31 AM EST
Posted by GoingNova_in_WA at February 12, 2005 07:15 AM

I just sent off my letter to Senator Obama. I asked him to explain his thinking. Doubt I'll get an answer though.
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:31 AM EST
Hey Mike!

I've been far too busy to watch the news the last few days - but one interesting tidbit I did pick up was Rummy proclaiming: "It is the Iraqi's responsibility to fight the insurgents. It's their country".

Man.
Default_user

-

By franster on Feb 12, 2005 7:32 AM EST
Why? Because there is a certain "kindness" toward others in that post. A brotherhood of people! This is exactly what the Democratic Party was in the past. If Howard can bring the focus back to this - well, can I just say: I love you Howard!

Posted by Kim*in*IN at February 12, 2005 07:27 AM

What you said.
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:33 AM EST
Re Obama -
franster, you know how it is. All you can do is judge these politicians by what you see on the campaign trail - and make your decision. Who knows how they'll turn out.

I'm giddy today, even though I was not a fan of Dean as Chair.
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:35 AM EST
Posted by GoingNova_in_WA at February 12, 2005 07:15 AM

As a New Yorker, it interests me that where Hillary would normally vote with Chuck on this kind of GOPpish bill, now that it's close to her re-election she is letting him go it alone.

Schumer won re-election by 74%, because the GOP put forward a little-known challenger and didn't fund him (the guy had ads on only in the last few days before the election, no mailers, no anything) and because Schumer has truly been outstanding on local issues. While his GOPpisness drives me nuts, I did vote for him because he's always been there for our community.

Not so Hillary. She gives me nothing much to like and the rumor is that Rudy is planning on running against her. If he hadn't had cancer the last time, he'd be a Senator today, but pundits are saying she can defend her seat against him as an incumbent.

As a presidential candidate she's a disaster for us and the best way to make sure that doesn't happen is to try to make sure she doesn't win another term in NY. We need an outstanding and fearless primary opponent. Too bad Spitzer's already picked a different race to win (Gov).

............

In the AP article about Dean, they quote Gerry McEntee as a supporter! And quote him lecturing Howard about what not to do. Sheesh. McEntee was very much the fair-weather friend, not an actual supporter. IUPAT comes and goes from us more often than a FedEx truck...
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:38 AM EST

Argh, AFSCME, not IUPAT. Too early for me!!!

Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:39 AM EST

I am so pleased that I missed that article, Volney. And you have it right on target, too, regards to Hill. I particularly appreciate your seeing that sometimes R's can be the better choice. I learned that lesson IN SPADES this go-around with all the pretend Democrats running.

Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:42 AM EST
Posted by Kim*in*IN at February 12, 2005 07:31 AM


Man oh man.

But then again, it's also the Iraqis' responsibility to pick their government, and they picked the Islamic slate but now we are doing a massive recount because we don't seem to like who they picked.

So "we" are certainly flip-floppers on this issue of what they are responsible for, aren't "we"?

I find it interesting that the draft is still such a radioactive issue even now that Bush has his second term. At least there's some kind of check and balance that operates somewhere, even if it's the final frontier of pi$$ed-off mothers.
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:43 AM EST
I'm not whistling Dixie when I say: I was not in favor of Dean as Chair!!!

But at the risk of sounding crude - This is the equivalent of giving a politically correct giant finger to all the backstabbers INCLUDING McEntee.
Default_user

-

By kheart on Feb 12, 2005 7:46 AM EST

What a wonderful way to wake up, a post from Rev Jackson! Thank you Rev Jackson, you are an inspiration.

Default_user

-

By johnmonroNewZealand on Feb 12, 2005 7:48 AM EST

Just read my posting, seems I can't spell principle. Sorry. That's where relying on a spelling checker causes mischief.

Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:48 AM EST
johnmonroNewZealand -
That was an outstanding post. You have summed up what we believe in our hearts, better than we do. I appreciate the time you took to put your thoughts together on all this.

We agree with you!

Please post more often.
Default_user

-

By kyna on Feb 12, 2005 7:49 AM EST
Great post....the full quote that has been attributed to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.:

"On some positions, Cowardice asks the question, "Is it safe?" Expediency asks the question, "Is it politic?" And Vanity comes along and asks the question, "Is it popular?" But Conscience asks the question "Is it right?" And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must do it because Conscience tells him it is right."
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:51 AM EST
johnmonroNewZealand -

We don't agree with every breath Howard takes - but we recognize he is special.

He is of historical significance. This will be born out, mark my works.
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:52 AM EST
"I wonder how many Americans truly understand just how strange your country seems from other places?"

Oh, it seems plenty strange from right here, believe me. I think what we don't get, however, is how much we are starting to scare other countries. We're like the character Michael Douglas played in "Falling Down", who went bonkers and self-justified vigilante killing and then at the end asks, "When did I become the bad guy?"

The people in power have capitalized on the fact that we are a poorly-educated nation that mindlessly believes whatever the media tells us. A place where people honest to God don't know the difference between Turkey and Tibet and can't find either one on a map. We have *got* to grow up, and fast!
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 7:54 AM EST
I just want to add this adendum I posted with the letter to Sununu on Kos:


"The other thing that seems to be entirely overlooked is that legal action is the peaceful alternative to physical aggression. It hardly seems prudent to generate the kind of frustration that produces a Timothy McVey or the unibomber.
Of course, if our system of law enforcement were more assiduous in prosecuting fraud, environmental degradation and violations of health and safety standards, ordinary people wouldn't have to bother with do-it-yourself civil suits."

The problem here isn't just limited to injuries or fraud suffered by individuals directly. We also have the question of how to get electoral fraud, for example, corrected BEFORE the wrong person is seated and starts making decisions. How to citizens insure that the laws on the books are enforced by recalictrant law enforcers. It's easy to violate or to disobey; much harder to make someone do his job.
Indeed, much of the mess we are in actually started with Reagan and Bush I who were masters in NOT DOING what the Congress directed--or doing it whenever it suited their own objectives.
So, for example, Reagan held back the waste-water treatment grants for new and upgraded sewers just so long that the sudden influx of money would make lots of communities and the people who build the plants happy. "Ah, yes, Ronald Reagan came through for us and sent us money for sewers. For sure we need to vote for him and for those nice representatives who reminded him to be nice to us."
From that kind of cynical manipulation of services that are essential to maintaining health, it was easy to condition all kinds of grants and programs on support for the cronies. It was also a short distance to destroying the sewers, water plants and electric systems in Iraq--not once now, but twice.
It make me sick every time I see footage of American troops laying sewer and water lines and acting like there never had been any there before.
I wouldn't be surprised if one reason they were bombed was so they could be rebuilt to serve new development--military bases and whatever land is being bought up by foreign interests.
And it makes me mad because we've seen all of this before in our own inner cities. There's a story upthread about the destruction of Dresden. Well, there was a time when the South Bronx looked just the same.
Humans are natural builders but, it seems, in some of them that inclination is perverted into making them destroyers. And that's the crew that's running the country now.
And neither Dean nor Kerry in the Oval Office would have been enough to stop them by themselves. It's going to take a lot of people. Would we have remained energized if either of them had won? Would there be a DFA if Dean were sitting in the White House? Would the Democratic party be on the verge of becoming a party of the people? Will we succeed if everybody just goes home and lets Dean do it?
Default_user

-

By JayDean on Feb 12, 2005 7:55 AM EST

Totally agree with your post, Volney. Glad you corrected that McEntee is with AFSCME. not IUPAT. I think IUPAT was pretty loyal to the Governor, if I'm remembering right this early in the morning.

Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 7:55 AM EST
A positive of this Dean deal.

Personality and excitement from the top of the Party.
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:55 AM EST
Posted by Kim*in*IN at February 12, 2005 07:43 AM


Heeheee, envisioning a giant finger being drawn on here (though that would be too naughty, but we can dream).

"The giant finger flips and having flipped, moves on..." -- Omar Khayyam
Default_user

-

By JayDean on Feb 12, 2005 7:56 AM EST
Posted by johnmonroNewZealand at February 12, 2005 07:40 AM

Thank you for your post, johnmonro!
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 7:58 AM EST
Posted by JayDean at February 12, 2005 07:55 AM

Much better than I.

It was one of those gestalt things, was writing along and saw a mental pic of Dean in front of an IUPAT sign (recent) and just typed IUPAT.

I am not good at keeping unions straight since no one in my eternally extended family has ever been in one. I know SEIU from the great folks I met in NH, but otherwise it's kind of an alphabet soup to me.
Default_user

-

By Kim*in*IN on Feb 12, 2005 8:00 AM EST
Is it a combination of the Rev Jackson and Howard that has me so gleeful?

How about this? Al Gore (having had his enlightenment) runs for POTUS in 2008 with Feingold as his running mate. Howard and Gore back together again! LOL
Default_user

-

By Mike*in*Raleigh*NC on Feb 12, 2005 8:03 AM EST
Posted by johnmonroNewZealand at February 12, 2005 07:40 AM

A very nice post indeed.
Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:09 AM EST

Thank you Rev. Jackson. Great post.

Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:11 AM EST
Today's the day!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Default_user

-

By rachael from Vermont on Feb 12, 2005 8:13 AM EST
Good morning.. what a good day it is!!!
C-Span having their call-in talk show about Dean as chair today. Man is it ever GREAT to hear some positives about Deans abilities!!!! WIll be gluded to the tv this am....I am a proud Vermonter and an American...
Default_user

-

By volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B on Feb 12, 2005 8:16 AM EST
Posted by Kim*in*IN at February 12, 2005 07:39 AM


Looking at Hillary vs. Rudy I see no real difference except that one of them isn't Hillary.

They are identical on choice, gun control and all the issues where New Yorkers are mostly liberal. Rudy is wildly lib for a lot of red staters and if he wasn't the hero of 9-11 he might even be their Hillary.

Where I disagree with Rudy is his blind allegiance to the NYPD. He has been the typical ex-prosecutor in this regard. It never mattered what the NYPD did, he would defend even the most indefensible behavior.

But I never once heard Hillary say a thing about this so if she starts criticizing him in an election campaign I can't feel there's anything behind that other than a desire to win.

Shake 'em up in a bag, IMO. She generally votes with the GOP and has been pretty useless as a Dem. Bumping her off early cools her jets on the Presidential thing and also sends a message to Schumer to start having some spine.
Default_user

-

By csusan on Feb 12, 2005 8:19 AM EST
I'm truly excited that today Dr. Dean will begin, in an official capacity, to help us do what he has been helping us do all along -- TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK!

To that end, I sent the following email to the DNC today about two Democratic senators who have come out for "bi-partisan" support for Bush's scheme to dismantle social security -- a cornerstone of maintaining a stable middleclass:

Today the LA Times reports that Democratic senators Tom Carper and Ben Nelson have said they're open to Mr. Bush's proposals for private retirement accounts.

Blatently, Sen. Carper calls for bi-partisanship as a form of " political cover" for lawmakers who support altering the country's long-successful and popular retirement program.

In other words, two Democratic senators have now come out is support of theft-through-dismantlement of Social Security.

For a century American democracy has survived because of policies that promote and expand middle-class stability. Now we have a president who is doing all he can to undermine that stability and transform America from a democratic republic into a banana one.

And apparently Democratic Senators Carper and Nelson are on board with this.

During the primaries I heard Dr. Howard Dean speak about the importance of protecting the middle class on a number of occasions. During the general election I heard Sen. Kerry speak to this issue as well.

As incoming chair of the DNC, Dr. Dean needs to explain to the party's elected officials how fundamentally important the middle class is to a stable democracy.

Elected officials like Carper and Nelson need to have remedial training on this issue and how Democratic Pary policy positions must support this fundamental philosophy.

And if they're too slow to grasp the principles -- or too narrowly focused on serving the interests of anti-middleclass constituencies -- they need to be told that the DNC doesn't support their candidacies.

Let Carper and Nelson switch parties if they will, and get some real Democrats to run in Nebraska and Delaware.
Default_user

-

By MonicaSmith on Feb 12, 2005 8:22 AM EST

Mornin' bestest blog in the whole whirl!!



WhooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooOooOoO

..........==========||||||||||..........|""|

..........._|.. D E A N ...|.|.|___|""""""""""|?|[(<

..........|___________|.|__.._.._.._.._.._.._||_

............( + ).....( + ).....( + )( + )( + )( + )..\

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""

??..C....H....A....I....R....M....A....N.....O..F....P..E..A..C..E

Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:25 AM EST
C-Span having their call-in talk show about Dean as chair today.

Posted by rachael from Vermont at February 12, 2005 08:13 AM

Thanks rachael. I just turned it on. Looks like it will be Dean Day all day on CSPAN.
Default_user

-

By JayDean on Feb 12, 2005 8:26 AM EST
Posted by MonicaSmith at February 12, 2005 07:54 AM

Monica, I agree with your post, and that Governor Dean is going to need all of us and a lot more besides! I also think that if Dean had won the nomination, electoral fraud and the sold out media would have prevented his election. Then, all the DLC types would have blamed us. If Chairman Dean can actually rebuild the Democratic party into one that stands for something, there could be a real renaissance of democracy in this country. I hope!
Default_user

-

By kheart on Feb 12, 2005 8:30 AM EST

The callers on CSPAN this morning are amazing. I haven't used the mute button once.

Default_user

-

By Johanne on Feb 12, 2005 8:35 AM EST

Mornin', Bloggers!



It's a beautiful, clear, if cold morning up here in the Great White North!



It's going to be a beautiful day when the Governor officially assumes the Chairmanship today!



I hope it will be the salvaging of the Democratic Party and the Republic to have our dynamic Governor at the helm!



Right, he may not *set* policy, but he sure will be a forceful executive and spokesman!



Go, Guv! We love ya, Howard!



Johanne

Default_user

-

By kheart on Feb 12, 2005 8:36 AM EST
August 1, 1858
As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is not democracy.
Abraham Lincoln

Happy Birthday President Lincoln
Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:37 AM EST

Yes, most of these callers are great! Lots of progressive people out there.

Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:38 AM EST

Coverage of the DNC starts at 9:45. Terry speaks at 10am, then some reports, then voting, then at about 10:45 remarks by Gov. Dean.

Default_user

-

By Johanne on Feb 12, 2005 8:52 AM EST

Saw this query on an earlier thread -



Posted by Johanne at February 11, 2005 04:41 PM



Johanne, I recall your saying you spend a lot of time in Canada. Which part?



We spend the spring and summer on Lake Huron (Grand Bend, ON)



Posted by John in Flagstaff at February 11, 2005 05:00 PM

********************



Hi, John in Flagstaff!



I was US Navy, which sent me to serve with the Canadian Forces in Nova Scotia in 1977. I met my eventual husband-to-be and got out of the service in 1979, and, because he was here, logically enough, I remained in Canada. I maintain dual citizenship, though, and emotional ties to my home in Pennsylvania.



I gotta admit I don't know Ontario all that well. I am in the Maritimes, hundreds of miles from Ontario, and truthfully we do more treks through New England and down to Pa. than we do westward in Canada. Unfortunately, but there just isn't time to do all the travelling that we would like. :-(



And -- American politics is more interesting than Canadian politics! Besides it is only the US that has Howard Dean!



Johanne

Default_user

-

By jjem! on Feb 12, 2005 8:56 AM EST

Does anyone know what Gov. Dean called those 2 DNC state positions? Or have a link to a quote about them?

Default_user

-

By Cris on Feb 12, 2005 8:57 AM EST

Does anyone here on the blog know of an official (or unoffical) schedule of rallies/celebrations in D.C. this afternoon or tonight??

Default_user

-

By donna*in*evanston on Feb 12, 2005 8:59 AM EST
I am so grateful that Howard Dean did not crawl back into bed and pull the covers over his head after what the media smear machine did to him last year. His courage has set an example for all of us to keep moving forward in the face of the most devastating personal attacks.

I say this because I am very happy that the day many of have been waiting for is here. At the same time, we will have to provide defense against those who are threatened by the force that is Howard Dean.

I'm not worried though. Howard gets stronger every day. All hail Chair Dean!
Default_user

-

By Vicki upstate Ny on Feb 12, 2005 9:00 AM EST

Good Morning one and all, light snow coming down, about 8 inches already on the ground. I would love to be able to be glued to C-Span this a.m., but jumping in the tub and then going canvasing for a local DFA Member who is running for village trustee. Go Wendy. Will be back later this afternoon, if I don't catch you Gov Dean ( before the official vote, let me say CONGRADULATIONS, you have worked very hard for this, along with your possee, So thanks go out to everyone involved.

Default_user

-

By JONESEY on Feb 12, 2005 9:02 AM EST
Great Day of the "Dean" Morning to you all:

In less than 45 minutes the Democratic Party will begin to get the spine infusion that failed last year.

LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!
Default_user

-

By GoingNova_in_WA on Feb 12, 2005 9:04 AM EST
I just sent off my letter to Senator Obama. I asked him to explain his thinking. Doubt I'll get an answer though.
Posted by franster at February 12, 2005 07:31 AM

Good for you franster! ; - )

As a New Yorker, it interests me that where Hillary would normally vote with Chuck on this kind of GOPpish bill, now that it's close to her re-election she is letting him go it alone.
Posted by volneysimmons*visit*DFA*Talent*B at February 12, 2005 07:35 AM

Sorry, but I'm thankful that Hillary isn't my Senator. We have Cantwell here. I believe she was the former CEO of RealNetworks. A normal corporate Democrat that is willing to sell her constituants down the river.

Happy Birthday President Lincoln

Posted by kheart at February 12, 2005 08:36 AM

Ahh, Lincoln's Birthday and Dean Day on C-Span. An excellent morning it is. ; - )
Default_user

-

By janefordean on Feb 12, 2005 9:14 AM EST
DEAN is RIGHT.
DEAN is RIGHT.
DEAN is RIGHT.
DEAN is RIGHT.
Enought of this "too far left" "too right wing" silliness. We know the truth.
DEAN IS RIGHT.
Jane
Default_user

-

By rachael from Vermont on Feb 12, 2005 9:20 AM EST
Thank you "Vicki from NY" for all YOUR hard work today!! Your energy is amazing...

I asked this last night, but don't know the answer.. is anyone sending a valentine to Judy for sacrificing her wonderful husband to DNC? Will she be in DC today? The respect I have for her is incredible and I think their kids are just as cool.. maybe we should send them a valentine also....
Again, I am proud to be a Vermonter and an American today..
Does anyone know if there will be "real" parties in Vermont today? I do know that the "Howard Bean Cafe" in Montpelier had talked about having a celebration, but I won't be able to attend..
Party on bloggers.....'Listener', e-mail me please.....:):):)
Default_user

-

By JayDean on Feb 12, 2005 9:20 AM EST

Thank you for your inspirational post on the DFA Blog, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr!

Default_user

-

By Holly J on Feb 12, 2005 9:22 AM EST

New Thread for this exciting day!!!

Default_user

-

By AnneW in NC on Feb 12, 2005 9:30 AM EST
Thank you Rev. Jackson for that eloquent call to moral arms. Beautiful. And I'm very glad that both Jacksons have Howard's back, so to speak.

Congratulations Dr. Gov. Chairman Howard, Godspeed!
Default_user

-

By JayDean on Feb 12, 2005 9:35 AM EST

If we had an email address, it would be great to send a valentine to Judy and the whole Dean family!

Default_user

-

By chelle.02 on Feb 12, 2005 9:48 AM EST
Thank you Rev. Jackson -

Keep speaking truth to power!
Default_user

-

By Mel_2.12istheNew11.3 on Feb 12, 2005 9:59 AM EST
I am so excited!!!!!!!!!

Will be home, parked in front of C-Span, by the time the Gov takes the podium.

But these 30 minutes are excruciating!!!
Default_user

-

By Linda in Wisc on Feb 12, 2005 10:01 AM EST

Thank you, Rev. Jackson, and you are so right. I think the fact that Gov. Dean knows where that moral center IS, is what drew so many of us to his presidential campaign. We joined early and we joined with passion. My fear will always be that he will be tempted by the "political center" - I hope he maintains the moral center.

Default_user

-

By Johanne on Feb 12, 2005 10:12 AM EST
New thread, bloggers - a message from Chairman Governor Dean!

Johanne
Default_user

-

By Lali on Feb 12, 2005 12:13 PM EST

Thank you Reverend Jackson. Truth is power. Power is truth. The power of truth can be hidden but cannot be stopped forever! We the people will take back our country under Chairman Howard Dean and other truthtellers like him.

Default_user

-

By johnmonroNewZealand on Feb 13, 2005 1:45 AM EST

With respect, pb



I think you may have misread what Jesse was saying- he made it very plain at the outset how he contrasted the "moral centre" from the "political centre" . In fact, it was this contrast that was probably the most important part of his posting. He says "The political center often chooses short term expediency over long term principles......... we must answer the "is it right" question—that the moral center, one much more profound than the political center."



However for the rest of your post, I entirely agree with everything you have to say, and I am sure Jesse would too.

Default_user

-

By Danny on Feb 13, 2005 3:05 AM EST

Right on Mr Jackson!

Add your comment

(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)

Post closed to commenting
star My DFA
star Members
star Groups
star Events
star Candidates



DFA Wireless



Blog for America

Recent Blog Posts

The Watercooler