Home » Blog » Assault on Women's Reproductive Rights Continues With a Vengeance...
Blog for America
Assault on Women's Reproductive Rights Continues With a Vengeance
The assault on women's reproductive rights continues with a vengeance.
As Congress struggled to pass health care reform to improve the lives of
America's families, anti-choice forces took advantage of the situation to mount
yet another assault on abortion. They were willing to sacrifice health care
reform -- even though millions of people would now be able to receive coverage,
even though the bill would finally begin to lower health care costs, even though
lives would be saved -- to enact anti-abortion provisions to take away
reproductive rights from millions of women.
The effect of the
Stupak/Pitts Amendment would be to deny the millions of women who get covered
through the exchanges access to comprehensive reproductive health care that
includes abortion services. These women would be denied coverage available today
in private health plans. The Amendment effectively bans private insurance
companies that participate in insurance exchanges from providing coverage of
abortion. It tries to camouflage the impact by providing an "abortion rider"
that women could choose to pay extra for to cover costs if they have an
abortion.
How gullible do they think we are? Women don't expect to have
an unintended pregnancy or a dangerous pregnancy that jeopardizes their health.
And few if any insurance plans would actually choose to provide such a rider.
Five states now have provisions to provide abortion riders. But folks have been
trying to find a plan that actually provides one -- and they're still looking.
Make no mistake about it: the Stupak Amendment will deny millions of
women access to safe, affordable reproductive health care. It puts an expensive
price tag on women's ability to act on their reproductive rights. This
outrageous provision must be stricken from the legislation before health care
reform becomes law.
In 2008 the country elected a pro-choice Congress
and a pro-choice President. The President has repeatedly told the country that
health care reform would not take away benefits from those who currently have
insurance. Now it's up to the President and the Congress to make certain that
women do not lose their benefits or rights as a result of health care reform.
There's no point in passing a health care reform bill that makes women less
healthy, less safe and less able to exercise their constitutional rights.
Add your comment
(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)You must be logged in to post comments
If you already have an account, login below, otherwise signup now
Videos of some of the 64 House Healthcare Heroes standing strong for a public health insurance option
Congressman Emanuel Cleaver
Congressman Lloyd Dogget
Congressman Keith Ellison
Congressman Bob Filner
Congressman Phil Hare
Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey
Congresswoman Maxine Waters
Blog for America
-
1 Turncoat Senator vs. 410,649 Americans
By Mary R on Nov 19, 2009 3:06 PM EST -
Send a message they can't miss
By Mary R on Nov 17, 2009 12:00 PM EST -
Will the real Democrat please stand up?
By Mary R on Nov 11, 2009 2:03 PM EST -
3 Million and Counting
By Mary R on Nov 6, 2009 12:47 PM EST -
Is Sen. Nelson listening to Nebraska?
By Mary R on Nov 6, 2009 12:31 PM EST
Recent Blog Posts
-
Spring Trend 2009 Abercrombie & Fitch
By Abercrombie F on Nov 21, 2009 9:44 PM EST -
Vacationing?
By Phoenix V on Nov 21, 2009 2:07 PM EST -
Bags And Shoes Gucci or Louboutin
By Buy l on Nov 21, 2009 2:37 AM EST -
Bags And Shoes Gucci or Louboutin
By Christian L on Nov 21, 2009 2:26 AM EST -
ugg boots management to achieve
By longs w on Nov 21, 2009 2:26 AM EST








- Are US Bishops Responsible for Anti-Abortion Amendment in Health Care Reform?
By Susan Rowe on Nov 10, 2009 12:57 PM ESThttp://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/2011/are_us_bishops_responsible_for_pro-life_amendment_in_health_care_reform/
Yes, they are responsible. And the church needs to lose it's tax-exempt status and needs to be required to file a lobby.