Home » Blog » Assault on Women's Reproductive Rights Continues With a Vengeance...

Blog for America

Assault on Women's Reproductive Rights Continues With a Vengeance

Written by: Connie Amidei on Nov 9, 2009 10:23 PM EST



The assault on women's reproductive rights continues with a vengeance. As Congress struggled to pass health care reform to improve the lives of America's families, anti-choice forces took advantage of the situation to mount yet another assault on abortion. They were willing to sacrifice health care reform -- even though millions of people would now be able to receive coverage, even though the bill would finally begin to lower health care costs, even though lives would be saved -- to enact anti-abortion provisions to take away reproductive rights from millions of women.

The effect of the Stupak/Pitts Amendment would be to deny the millions of women who get covered through the exchanges access to comprehensive reproductive health care that includes abortion services. These women would be denied coverage available today in private health plans. The Amendment effectively bans private insurance companies that participate in insurance exchanges from providing coverage of abortion. It tries to camouflage the impact by providing an "abortion rider" that women could choose to pay extra for to cover costs if they have an abortion.

How gullible do they think we are? Women don't expect to have an unintended pregnancy or a dangerous pregnancy that jeopardizes their health. And few if any insurance plans would actually choose to provide such a rider. Five states now have provisions to provide abortion riders. But folks have been trying to find a plan that actually provides one -- and they're still looking.

Make no mistake about it: the Stupak Amendment will deny millions of women access to safe, affordable reproductive health care. It puts an expensive price tag on women's ability to act on their reproductive rights. This outrageous provision must be stricken from the legislation before health care reform becomes law.

In 2008 the country elected a pro-choice Congress and a pro-choice President. The President has repeatedly told the country that health care reform would not take away benefits from those who currently have insurance. Now it's up to the President and the Congress to make certain that women do not lose their benefits or rights as a result of health care reform. There's no point in passing a health care reform bill that makes women less healthy, less safe and less able to exercise their constitutional rights.

Tags:

Discuss
 

Reply

N734823365_4437_tinythumb

- Are US Bishops Responsible for Anti-Abortion Amendment in Health Care Reform?

By Susan Rowe on Nov 10, 2009 12:57 PM EST

http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/2011/are_us_bishops_responsible_for_pro-life_amendment_in_health_care_reform/

Yes, they are responsible.  And the church needs to lose it's tax-exempt status and needs to be required to file a lobby.

Add your comment

(to reply directly to a comment, click the reply icon for that comment)

You must be logged in to post comments

If you already have an account, login below, otherwise signup now




(Forgot password?)


Yes, Remember Me

Videos of some of the 64 House Healthcare Heroes standing strong for a public health insurance option

Congressman Emanuel Cleaver



Congressman Lloyd Dogget



Congressman Keith Ellison



Congressman Bob Filner



Congressman Phil Hare



Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey



Congresswoman Maxine Waters

Blog for America

Recent Blog Posts

The Watercooler