Blog

There's Even More Troubling News for Mitch McConnell in the New Polls Released Today. MORE HERE:

You probably saw this shocker of a headline today: 

Well there's more troubling numbers for Mitch McConnell, and and we've got the full report here. As you see, he's not only wildly unpopular, but his stance on Social Security is wildly out of touch with his constituents. Give a read and let us know what your analysis is in the comments. 

Kentucky Senate Race Questions

If the general election for U.S. Senate were held today, and the choices were Republican Mitch McConnell and Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes, for whom would you vote?

Mitch McConnell ........................................................... 44%

Alison Lundergan Grimes ............................................. 45%

Undecided .................................................................... 11%

(Asked of 1,210 Kentucky voters MOE 2.8%)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Republican Mitch McConnell is handling his job as U.S. Senator?

Approve ................................................................ 40%

Disapprove ........................................................... 51%

No opinion .............................................................. 9%

(Asked of 1,210 Kentucky voters MOE 2.8%)

After 30 years in the U.S. Senate, do you believe Republican Mitch McConnell deserves re-election, or not?

Believe he does  ................................................................  38%

Believe he does not ...........................................................  54%

Not sure ..............................................................................  8%

(Asked of 625 Kentucky voters MOE 3.9%)

If Republican Mitch McConnell supported any cuts to Social Security or Medicare benefits, including raising the retirement age or reducing cost-of-living adjustments, would you be more or less likely to support his candidacy for U.S. Senate, or would it not make a difference?

More likely....................................................... 15%

Less likely ....................................................... 52%

Wouldn't make a difference............................. 33%

(Asked of 585 Kentucky voters - MOE 4.1%)



Social Security Questions

A proposal in Congress would increase Social Security benefits, resulting in a worker at age 75 receiving $452 more in benefits per year and a worker at age 85 receiving $807 more per year. Do you support or oppose this proposal?

Support ...........................................................  51%

Oppose ...........................................................  24%

Not sure ..........................................................  24%

(Asked of 585 Kentucky voters - MOE 4.1%)

Right now, wealthy Americans only pay Social Security taxes on the first $113,000 of their income. In order to strengthen Social Security, do you support or oppose scrapping this cap so that wealthy Americans pay the same rate on their income as ordinary Americans?

Support  ................................. 62%

Oppose  ................................. 20%

Not Sure ................................. 18%

(Asked of 625 Kentucky voters - MOE 3.9%)

In order to reduce the national debt, would you support or oppose cutting spending on Social Security benefits, which is the government retirement program for the elderly?

Support ........................................................... 11%

Oppose ........................................................... 79%

Not sure.......................................................... 9%

(Asked of 1,210 Kentucky voters MOE 2.8%)

Do you support or oppose the recent White House proposal to cut the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits, resulting in a worker at age 75 receiving $658 less in benefits per year?

Support ........................................................... 13%

Oppose ........................................................... 74%

Not sure .......................................................... 13%

(Asked of 625 Kentucky voters MOE 3.9%)

Poll conducted by Public Policy Polling (PPP) on behalf of Democracy For America (DFA) and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) on July 19-21, 2013. PPP was#1 most accurate pollster of 2012.

Read Comments (3)

Categories: Social Security Elections


VIDEO: Senators Harkin and Begich have a lot to say on Social Security

Sen. Begich and Sen. Harkin sat down to discuss their path to preserve Social Security for generations to come. Check it out...

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

What's in the video:

0:35 - you’ll want to get married and raise your kids, but now your parents will have to move in with you

1:00 - McConnell thinks he knows better than Ds about young people

1:40 - Begich knows that people want to be paid back for the money they’ve paid in

1:52 - Harkin knows that Wall Street has been trying to grab the money

2:21 - Begich talks about the cost of living adjustment, and keeping the chained-CPI out of the picture on our elders

3:02 - Harkin’s take on laborers vs. office workers needing retirement. People work for 40 years in jobs that aren’t cushy

3:58 - Challenge to young people to find an alternative to social security. It’s going to be much, much pricier.

4:13 - From Begich, we can renew faith in government, and make a promise to future generations that isn’t hard to fix

What it means:

  • Benefits expand $800/year
  • The cap on taxing income is lifted, making the rich pay into the program just like millions of working Americans
  • Cost of living adjustments actually reflect the changing needs of seniors
  • Social Security remains safe for 75 years, and is no longer a bargaining chip for any party

Stand up for our seniors. Join the 113,000 others who have sent a message and sign the petition supporting progressive Social Security reform!

Read Comments (4)

Categories: Social Security


Democracy for America: Nominate a Fed Chair Who Will Stand Up for The Middle Class

Jim Dean, Chair of Democracy for America, released this statement following the announcement the White House would delay an appointment of a new Fed Chairman until this Fall:

"Democracy for America is happy to hear that the White House has decided to postpone the appointment for Chair of the Federal Reserve until this fall.  Given her considerable contributions both inside and outside the Fed and her recognition of the realities that all Americans face in today's economy, Janet Yellen is clearly the right person for this critical post and we urge President Obama to appoint her when the time comes.

Ultimately, the President's credibility and legacy as a true champion of the middle class is on the line in this choice and we intend to work to ensure he doesn't nominate someone, like Larry Summers, whose Wall Street ties makes him inappropriate choice for Fed Chairman." -- Jim Dean, Chair, Democracy for America

Read Comments (8)

Categories: Press Releases


Why Rep. Trent Franks is a terrible choice to oversee changes to the Voting Rights Act

Remember Trent Franks? He seems familiar. Why did he last show up on the radar?

During a House Judiciary hearing on his abortion bill Wednesday, Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) said that he opposes an exemption for rape victims because "the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low." (HuffPo)

Oh, that's right. He hates women. 

FranksBut that was back in January. Since then he's had some time to think of another way to show just how out of touch he and the rest of the GOP have become on just about... everything. 

He's the point man in the House for rebuilding section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. If anything, putting Trent in charge of the Voting Rights Act has answered the question that everyone's been asking since preclearance was struck down. The House, indeed, will not move in favor of the VRA.

Most of the talk coming from him and others have been that Justice Roberts said what everyone is thinking, that we don't really need section 4, that preclearance is a relic of the past, and that we need to stop thinking like it's 1965. Because there are no more racial motives in electoral politics. 

The GOP knows that Democrats will be hit hard if voter ID laws go through. Republicans scream and shout for these laws to fight fraud. The reality is that fraud takes place very rarely, and the same week preclearance was struck down, several states it once applied to introduced those exact ID laws. The timing isn't remotely fishy. At all.

The tragedy of giving Franks the charge of overseeing a change in the preclearance formula is that he doesn't care. He calls marriage equality a "treat to the nation's survival." We know his stance on reproductive rights. Now he gets to add the notch of suppressing democracy to his belt.

Why do we still need the Voting Rights Act? There's the 1,500 discriminatory laws it's blocked since it was passed, the 80 bills introduced in 2013 alone that are trying to suppress votes. 

Congressional action on the issue is in its infancy. There's still time to change the face of our democracy's future. 

Add your name to the campaign telling congress to build a new, responsible Voting Rights Act

Read Comments (9)

Categories: Voting Rights


How Elizabeth Warren was the real winner in the Senate

From: SalonRepublicans cave over threat of "nuclear option"

It seems like every single headline coming out of the Senate this week has been some variation of that title, and the brinkmanship that nearly brought Majority Leader Reid to use the "nuclear option" (gutting the filibuster) against the GOP's obstructionism. 

While the threat of filibuster reform was enough to move the GOP to end its filibuster on a few Executive Branch appointments, it wasn't enough to actually change the filibuster.

So who came out on top? Elizabeth Warren, that's who. 

Richard Cordray of Ohio has finally been confirmed as the boss of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after a very protracted Senate fight to have him seated. The CFPB was created by the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (usually just called Dodd-Frank), and Cordray's confirmation ends the 700 day GOP blockade.

How is Warren connected to the CFPB? She basically oversaw its creation and organization. Her work on it made her a widely popular choice to be nominated as the director, but she was ultimately rejected due to overwhelming Republican opposition (read: she scared the hell out of them). 

Warren began her fight for the CFPB in 2009, a time when the Great Recession was tearing apart the economy. Now? She not only got the CFPB, but she was presiding over the Senate when Cordray's nomination passed. Talk about icing on the cake.

The fighting in the Senate was definitely a boost for progressives, but it left the filibuster unchanged. We got the CFPB, we got the nominations, but we still need comprehensive filibuster reform.

Add your name and join 80,000 progressives demanding Harry Reid reform the filibuster!

Read Comments (13)

Categories: Economy and Jobs


Stay informed -- like DFA on Facebook. ×