January 17, 2012
A message from Gov. Howard Dean:
The Citizens United Supreme Court decision has changed the way we run elections in this country, allowing billionaires to secretly finance so-called "Super PACs" and empowering big corporations and Wall Street like never before. The attacks that we saw in 2010 were just the beginning. Any candidate who challenges Wall Street's status quo is going to come under an avalanche of hateful attack ads this year -- and no candidate is going to come under greater attack than Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth is a progressive champion who has spent her career fighting for working families. That work is what's going to make her Wall Street's number one target this year. We need to have Elizabeth's back in this fight. We need progressive fighters like her in the Senate to overturn Citizens United and get this country working for all Americans again. Join me in supporting Elizabeth Warren -- Please contribute $12 right now. This week is the two-year anniversary of Scott Brown's special election. He's playing up the anniversary to officially announce his reelection campaign and he's probably going to raise huge sums of money from big contributors because of it. Elizabeth's campaign isn't fueled by big money -- it's fueled by tens of thousands of small contributions from everyday Americans across the country. A grassroots campaign like that is the only thing that can beat big corporate money, so please join me in supporting Elizabeth today. Beating Elizabeth Warren is Wall Street's top priority. Contribute $12 now to help put Elizabeth over the top. Thank you, Russell, for everything you do. -Howard Gov. Howard Dean, M.D. Founder, Democracy for America
January 17, 2012
The Internet is where democracy happens. The last thing we need is corporate censorship of free speech. Arshad Hasan, Executive Director of Democracy for America Burlington, VT Statement from Arshad Hasan, Executive Director of Democracy for America (DFA) on DFAs participation in the web site blackout on Wed. Jan. 18th to stop SOPA & PIPA, or corporate censorship of the Internet: Democracy for America recently divested our 48 domains from GoDaddy in protest of their support of SOPA and PIPA which will amount to unlimited corporate censorship of the Internet. The Internet is where democracy happens. In a post Citizens United world where corporations already can spend unlimited amounts of money in politics, the last thing we need is corporate censorship of free speech. Democracy for America was founded from Howard Deans campaign for President, a campaign that was born on the Internet where innovations in online organizing paved the way to more participation in our political system than ever before. Our organization of deeply engaged members and volunteers would not exist without a free and open internet. The idea that corporations would have the power to police or censor the Internet puts Democratic movements like ours at risk everywhere. # # # ABOUT DEMOCRACY FOR AMERICA Democracy for America is a people-powered Democratic Political Action Committee. With over one million members nationwide, DFA is a grassroots powerhouse working to change our country and the Democratic Party from the bottom-up. www.DemocracyForAmerica.com Paid for by Democracy for America, www.democracyforamerica.com, and not authorized by any candidate.
January 16, 2012
A message from Levana Layendecker:
Today we celebrate a great leader who fought hard to make sure that all Americans, regardless of the color of their skin, could fully participate in our Democracy. The most fundamental right Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. fought for was the right to vote.
And today, those rights are under attack.
This year, 34 Republican state legislatures introduced bills designed to turn voters away from the polls who cannot produce specific types of state issued ID. If all of these bills pass, roughly 21 million voters will lose their right to vote. And, it's no coincidence that most of those voters are minorities, students, and elderly voters who vote Democrat.
That's why, today, we are supporting Rep. Keith Ellison's two bills to protect the right to vote.
Sign on as a citizen co-sponsor today to protect the right to vote by making sure election boards cannot require state ID and allowing voters to register the same day they go to the polls.
Rep. Keith Ellison, co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, explains how these bills affect voters in a recent post on Daily Kos:
In Indiana, 12 nuns were denied the right to vote in the last presidential election because they didn't have "updated" identification. The facts that some of them had old passports, they were in their 80s and 90s and didn't drive--or that they're nuns--seemed not to be a good basis for affirming their identities.
These are not isolated incidents. They are part of the largest effort to disenfranchise voters since the Jim Crow era, almost exclusively targeting youth and minority voters.
To stop this attack on voting rights, Rep. Ellison introduced two bills to curb voter suppression. The Same Day Registration Act would require states to provide for same day voter registration for a federal election. The Voter Access Protection Act would make sure election officials cannot require photo identification in order to cast a vote or register to vote.
Add your voice and become a citizen co-sponsor of these two bills today.
Don't allow this year to be the first in our history that we shrink the size of the voting public, instead of expanding it. Make this Martin Luther King Day count, and sign on to protect voting rights.
Thank you for all that you do,
Levana Layendecker, Communications Director Democracy for America
January 13, 2012
Levana Layendecker, Communications Director Pick of the Week:
I never thought that after the tireless work by Martin Luther King, Jr. and the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that the day would come when the right to vote is in danger - again. Why and How You Should Fight Voter ID Laws By Martin Longman
These polling place Photo ID restriction laws have proliferated like crazy since the 2010 midterm elections. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University has many reports on the impact of changes in election law. According to onerecent report(pdf), new polling place Photo ID restriction laws will disenfranchise 3.2 million qualified voters. Even more restrictive "proof of citizenship" laws (for which a driver's license is insufficient) will disenfranchise another quarter of a million citizenswho can't provide the necessary proof(do you know where your Birth Certificate is?).
Connor Stewart, Development Associate Pick of the Week:
While the GOP was out crying foul over President Obamas recess appointments its interesting that we live in a age where his legal council has to defend his actions that previous presidents have taken.
Justice Dept. Defends Obama Recess Appointments By Charlie Savage
"Much of the criticism of Mr. Obamas move has been based on the theory that the Senate has been meeting even if only one lawmaker is briefly in the chamber every three days. If so, then it has broken up its long winter vacation into a sequence of short recesses."
Julielyn Gibbons, Training Director Pick of the Week:
This piece is a fascinating dissection at the crossroads of three of my favorite subjects: the societal role of technology, local and international politics, the growing global protest movement. This article is so thorough that even after reading the whole thing, you find yourself only hungrier for more
#Riot: Self-Organized, Hyper-Networked Revolts - Coming to a City Near You By Bill Wasik
The year 2011 brought waves of crowd unrest on a worldwide scale unseen for more than three decades. From Januarys revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia through a summer of sit-ins and demonstrations in Europe, India, and Israel to the Occupy Wall Street movement in the fall, the past year saw a new generation of activists rediscoverand subtly reinvent, through social mediathe massive street action as a means of political expression.
Jase Roberts, Technology Director Pick of the Week: This was a top post on Reddit this week and thats a big deal.Reddit blacking itself out on January 18th in protest of SOPA sends an incredibly important message to the powers that be. Stopped they must be, on this all depends By the admins at Reddit
Were as addicted to reddit as the rest of you. Many of you stand with us against PIPA/SOPA, but we know support for a blackout isnt unanimous. We're not taking this action lightly. We wouldnt do this if we didnt believe this legislation and the forces behind it were a serious threat to reddit and the Internet as we know it. Blacking out reddit is a hard choice, but we feel focusing on a day of action is the best way we can amplify the voice of the community.
Kaili Lamb, Political Campaign Manager Pick of the Week: With Ron Paul finishing in Second in New Hampshire it is important we take a second look at his freedom record.While 65 percent of New Hampshire voters support the freedom to marry, Ron Paul does not. Progressive voters in primary states take note.
Ron Paul vs. Freedom (To Marry) By Dean Barker
"I will stand with the people of Iowa, against Unconstitutional federal power grabs, and will fight to protect each states right not to be forced to recognize a same sex marriage against the will of its people. If I were a member of the Iowa legislature, I would do all I could to oppose any attempt by rogue judges to impose a new definition of marriage on the people of my state." Amanda McKay, Executive Assistant to Governor Dean Pick of the Week: While Huntsman had a decent finish in New Hampshire, its sad that hes being beat by a candidate who isnt even on the ballot in South Carolina.Plus, hes comedian Stephen Colbert.
Stephen Colbert Leads Jon Huntsman in South Carolina Poll Posted on the Huffington Post
"The new poll, released on Tuesday, shows five percent of primary voters in the Palmetto State picking Colbert, while four percent choose Huntsman...Even if Huntsman finishes second in New Hampshire tonight it doesn't speak well for his prospects down the line that he's running behind Stephen Colbert," Tom Jensen of PPP wrote on the polling organization's blog."
January 12, 2012
Its easy to see the dissatisfaction that Americans currently have with our government. Poll after poll shows Congress ratings in the single digits and President Obamas just over 50 percent. Even this fall, people clamored to the streets occupying parks and public spaces around the country demanding that their needs be listened to since they no longer felt direct contact with their elected officials generated any sort of result. But as we continue to see this dissatisfaction and tension with our government escalate to new highs, campaigns and Super-Pacs across the country are receiving millions upon millions of dollars in donations to help sway undecided voters and muddle the image of the opposition.
How can the growing discontent with our government translate into such a super growth in campaign contributions by both candidates and Super-Pacs. Ive got two words for you Citizens United.
In January of 2010 the Supreme Court handed down its decision for Citizens United v Federal Election Committee, stating that the first Amendment in the Constitution prohibits the government from placing restrictions and limits on independent contributions for political purposes for corporations and unions. This decision essentially unleashed corporations and untapped money into the political process.
This week on the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Courts decision, we see plain as day the impact this decision has had on our political process. Just yesterday, TIME reported that Republican presidential candidates and outside groups have spent $38.7 million on political advertising since last fall. Thats 4 months. If you break down 38.7 million over 4 months, Republican candidates and outside groups have spent and average of 9.67 million per month. Already these same groups have spent over 9 million to influence voters for the upcoming South Carolina primary happening on January 21st. This election isnt the first time weve seen a influx of spending.
During 2010s Congressional elections, which was the first federal election to occur after the Supreme Court handed down the Citizens United decision, spending by non-party committees (corporations and Super-Pacs) increased to approximately $304.7 million dollars or four times the level reported for the 2006 Congressional elections. And 2010 wasnt even a presidential election.
This monetary influence and spending is astounding especially if you consider the outside economic conditions around the country. When everyday Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck decrying that the distribution of wealth be more evenly distributed, is allowing corporations to buy and influence politicians because of campaign contributions fair?
Massachusetts Attorney General, Martha Coakly put it best in a recent post:
It means the influence and interests of the wealthy few will continue to further shout down the voices of everyone else. And because of the shadowy nature of these groups, it also means that a large portion of their advertising will take the form of negative attacks, which will only contribute to the increasingly hostile nature of our political discourse.
A quick look at the 2010 census data clearly indicates that the distribution of wealth is a major problem for a majority of Americans who have coined themselves the 99 percent. The Washington Post reports that this gap is real - the share of overall U.S. wealth held by the top 10 percent of the population that increased from 49 percent in 2005 to 56 percent in 2009. Another alarming statistic from the census found that a record number of Americans nearly 1 in 2 have fallen into poverty or make earnings that typically classify them as low income.
While all of this can be overwhelming and make any rational person scream out of frustration, we can win back our political process. If the growing number of angry protesters occupying public discourse on this income gap has taught us anything, it should prove that when citizens rally together demanding enough eventually the government must listen. Its time for us to begin to rally around overturning the Citizens United decision.
Luckily, the movement has already begun. In cities and municipalities across the country citizens have encouraged their local governments to pass resolutions opposing the Supreme Courts decision. Just this week, New York City Council passed a resolution but these resolutions arent just in major progressive cities like New York and Los Angeles resolutions or ballot measures opposing the decision have been proposed or passed by 36 local governments. These governments include places like Duluth, MN, Oakland, CA, Albany, NY, and Boulder, CO. This isnt a fight that will be won by local governments alone. Weve got to take the movement and build strengthening the fight by bringing the voices of all Citizens on board. Back in December, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders introduced a constitutional amendment, The Saving American Democracy bill that would overturn Citizens United. Since Bernie wrote to DFA members on Tuesday weve had over 50 thousand supporters stand up and become a citizen co-signer to the bill. The movement will continue to grow but we need supporters from every state, every community to join on. This fight to overturn Citizens United will not be simple especially since, we the people, will be tackling giant corporations. Will you become a co-signer today and ask your friends to do the same?
Together we can stop corporate influence in politics and bring back democracy to those that truly count the people of the United States.
Inappropriate text or images on this page? Please click here to let us know.